KSR v. Teleflex. Part 1: Impact of U.S Supreme Court Patent Law on Canadian intellectual property and regulatory rights landscape.
نویسنده
چکیده
In KSR, SCOTUS retooled the standard for obviousness to bring it back in line with the court's previous decisions in Hotchkiss and Graham. A comparative review of the law of obviousness in the United States and Canada, and its relation to innovation and competition, was undertaken in Sections II and III. The focal point of observed differences is the inherent creativity and inventiveness of the PHOSITA, which in turn informs several binary and highly rigid aspects of Canadian patent law relevant to a statutory determination of obviousness. While American and English skilled technicians are viewed by courts in their parent jurisdictions as inherently creative and thus able to construe the prior art both implicitly and explicitly, the Canadian PHOSITA possesses not even a "mere scintilla" of inventiveness. As such, the reference point for the obviousness analysis in Canada, but not in the U.S. or U.K., is a PHOSITA who has much less than the average level of normative creativity, who is indeed no PHOSITA at all due to a de minimus level of creativity. The result in either case is removal of the PHOSITA from the obviousness determination, contrary to the provisions of Canadian patent legislation. As such, the current test for obviousness in Canada parallels in many important aspects the Federal Circuit's much maligned pre-KSR "teaching, suggestion, motivation" test that was explicitly overturned in KSR. For reasons discussed in Section III, jurisdictional differences of this nature not only have the potential to harm Canadian inventors and firms seeking to market innovative products globally, but may also, paradoxically, inhibit strong innovation by granting weak patents in the context of permissive legislation and regulations governing the approval and marketing of medical products.
منابع مشابه
KSR v. Teleflex. Part 2: Impact of U.S Supreme Court Patent Law on Canadian and global systems-based innovation ecologies.
متن کامل
PATENTLY NON-OBVIOUS II: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE HINDSIGHT ISSUE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT IN KSR v. TELEFLEX
For the first time in thirty years, the Supreme Court will consider the core patent requirement that an invention be non-obvious. At the heart of the case lies the challenge of how to insulate non-obvious decisions from the distortion of the hindsight bias. This Article reports the latest empirical studies in a line of hindsight research, which present experimental data bearing directly on the ...
متن کاملNot All Patents Are Created Equal: Bias against Predictable Arts Patents in the Post-ksr Landscape
Investment in intellectual property is considered a shrewd business strategy. However, companies that invest heavily in patenting the results of research and development may later be surprised by their inability to generate revenue from their patent portfolios. This is because those seeking to enforce patents in the predictable arts may find themselves stymied by recent developments in patent j...
متن کامل"Obvious to try": a proper patentability standard in the pharmaceutical arts?
Pharmaceutical research often entails making small modifications to candidate drug molecules—modifications that might be deemed “obvious to try”—and then studying the largely unpredictable, yet critical, resulting biological effects. Recognizing this characteristic unpredictability, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has traditionally upheld the patentability of obvious-to-try ph...
متن کاملA New Formula for Analyzing Formulation-patent Obviousness
The generic drug industry, which is estimated to save American consumers $10 billion a year,1 owes much of its current market success to Congress’s enactment of the Hatch-Waxman Act in 1984.2 The Hatch-Waxman Act sought to achieve a delicate balance, one where Americans could obtain unprecedented access to low-cost prescription medicine without somehow undermining the incentive of brand name dr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Health law journal
دوره 15 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007